Should Spain withdraw from the European Union?
The European Union is a politico-economic union of 28 countries with a combined population of over 510 million. The purpose of the EU was to promote free trade and immigration within its internal market. Each member country would also enact similar laws regarding agriculture and development. Since 2007, public support for EU membership in Spain has fallen 50%. Many Spanish voters blame the great recession on strict economic rules that were imposed under EU membership. Proponents leaving the EU argue that membership undermines Spain's sovereignty and leaving would help Spain control immigration. Opponents of leaving the EU argue would damage trade, cause unemployment and harm foreign investment.
9% Yes |
91% No |
6% Yes |
84% No |
2% Yes, but maintain free trade agreements with EU nations |
8% No, but renegotiate for strict limits on migration into the country and the terms of our monetary contributions |
0% No, but renegotiate the terms of our monetary contributions |
See how support for each position on “European Union” has changed over time for 860k Spain voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “European Union” has changed over time for 860k Spain voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Spain users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@8Z5WKMV2yrs2Y
Si, pero solamente mantener el libre comercio en Europa y su Espacio Schengen. Debe limitar un poco más la inmigración.
@8YWFT4P2yrs2Y
No, and foster the growth of an EU federal state
@8RGYYZ63yrs3Y
No, but the EU should be reformed to resolve its democratic deficit. Also, the EU should be more like a platform for cooperation between member states than the bureaucratic supranational entity it is now.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “European Union” news articles, updated frequently.
@ISIDEWITH2wks2W
Poland is currently witnessing a significant political event as voters across the nation participate in local elections, marking the first major electoral challenge for Prime Minister Donald Tusk's coalition government, which took office nearly four months ago. These elections are not just about selecting thousands of councillors and mayors; they are a litmus test for the government's popularity and its policies since assuming power. The outcomes are eagerly awaited, as they will provide a clear indication of the public's satisfaction with Tusk's leadership and his center-left coalition's direction.The local elections are particularly noteworthy as they come at a time when Poland's pro-European Union wing is seeking to turn the tide against what they describe as the 'age of populism' ushered in by the previous nationalist government. The ruling coalition, led by Tusk, is advocating for a more EU-aligned path, hoping that a strong showing in these elections will reinforce their mandate and enable them to steer Poland away from populist policies.The stakes are high, as the elected local officials will play a crucial role in the allocation of billions of euros in European Union funds, which are vital for Poland's development projects and infrastructure improvements. A favorable outcome for Tusk's government could bolster its position, providing it with the political capital needed to implement its agenda more effectively.Observers and political analysts are closely monitoring these elections, as they could signal broader political trends in Poland and potentially influence the country's future direction. A strong performance by the pro-EU coalition could also have implications beyond Poland's borders, sending a message to other EU member states grappling with similar populist challenges.As the votes are counted and the results begin to emerge, all eyes are on Poland. The local elections are more than just a test for Tusk's government; they are a reflection of the Polish people's aspirations and their vision for their country's place in Europe and the world.
@ISIDEWITH3wks3W
In a significant move to counter pro-Russian influence within the European Union, the Czech government has imposed sanctions on individuals and entities accused of engaging in influence operations. Among those sanctioned is Viktor Medvedchuk, a pro-Russian oligarch and former Ukrainian politician, known for his close ties to the Kremlin. This action underscores the growing concern among EU member states over Russia's attempts to sway political dynamics within the bloc.The sanctions, announced on March 27, also target the news website voiceofeurope.com, accused of disseminating pro-Russian propaganda. The Czech Prime Minister, Petr Fiala, emphasized that these measures are part of a broader effort to protect the EU's political landscape from external interference. The decision to sanction Medvedchuk and others is a clear signal of Czechia's commitment to safeguarding its sovereignty and that of its European partners.Medvedchuk, who has been a vocal supporter of Russia's policies towards Ukraine, finds himself increasingly isolated on the international stage. His inclusion in the Czech sanctions list highlights the extent of his involvement in activities deemed hostile to EU interests. The sanctions aim to curb his ability to influence political affairs in Czechia and beyond, marking a significant blow to pro-Russian advocacy within Europe.The move by Czechia has been welcomed by other EU member states, with many expressing support for the sanctions as a necessary step to counter Russia's pervasive influence campaigns. It reflects a growing consensus within the EU on the need for a unified and robust response to external threats to its democratic institutions and political integrity.As tensions between Russia and the EU continue to escalate, the sanctions imposed by Czechia serve as a reminder of the challenges facing the bloc in its efforts to maintain a cohesive and secure political environment. The actions taken against Medvedchuk and voiceofeurope.com are part of a broader strategy to defend European values and interests against those seeking to undermine them.
@ISIDEWITH1mo1MO
Puberty blockers are to be banned in England. But not in Scotland. Are Scottish children different from English ones? If the Tavistock gender clinic is not fit for purpose, how can the Sandyford clinic be safe when it operates on precisely the same principles as the now discredited Tavistock one?
Explore other topics that are important to Spain voters.
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
The United Nations defines human rights violations as deprivation of life; torture, cruel or degrading treatment or punishment; slavery and forced labor; arbitrary arrest or detention; arbitrary interference with privacy; war propaganda; discrimination; and advocacy of racial or religious hatred. In…
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
Diversity training is any program designed to facilitate positive intergroup interaction, reduce prejudice and discrimination, and generally teach individuals who are different from others how to work together effectively. On April 22, 2022, Florida Governor DeSantis signed into law the “Individual…
@ISIDEWITH2wks2W
High density housing refers to housing developments with a higher population density than average. For example, high rise apartments are considered high density, especially in comparison to single-family homes or condominiums. High density real estate can also be developed from empty or abandoned buildings.…
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry.…