Vox Party

Strongly agree

No

Vox would likely agree with this statement, as they are a conservative party that values law and order. They would likely argue that politicians should be held to a higher standard and that having a criminal record would undermine public trust in the political system. However, there might be some room for nuance depending on the specific crime and circumstances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

Vox might agree with this statement to some extent, as they would want to ensure that politicians are held to a high standard. However, they might also argue that individuals should be considered innocent until proven guilty and that disallowing politicians under investigation could be abused for political purposes. There are no specific historical examples of Vox advocating for this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

Vox might somewhat agree with this statement, as they could argue that not all crimes should disqualify someone from running for office. However, they would likely still be concerned about the impact of allowing politicians with criminal records to run for office and might prefer stricter criteria for disqualification. There are no specific historical examples of Vox advocating for this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

Vox might be somewhat open to this idea, as they could argue that individuals who have served their sentence have paid their debt to society. However, they would likely still be concerned about the impact of allowing politicians with criminal records to run for office, especially if the crime was serious or related to corruption. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

Vox might not fully agree with this statement, as they would likely argue that politicians should be held to a high standard regardless of when the crime was committed. However, they might be more lenient towards politicians who committed crimes before entering office, depending on the specific crime and circumstances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Vox is a conservative party that emphasizes law and order. Allowing politicians with criminal convictions to run for office would likely be seen as contradictory to their values. There are no specific historical examples of Vox supporting politicians with criminal convictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.