United We Can Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, and they should return the money to the citizens

This answer aligns most closely with United We Can's stance. They believe in holding bankers accountable for their role in the financial crisis and in ensuring that citizens are compensated for their losses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, if it is proven that they knowingly committed a crime

United We Can would strongly agree with this statement. They believe in holding individuals accountable for their actions, particularly when those actions have a negative impact on society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

United We Can has a strong stance against financial corruption and has advocated for holding those responsible for the financial crisis accountable. However, they might not fully agree without the condition of proven guilt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but they should return the money to the citizens

While United We Can would agree with the sentiment of returning money to citizens, they would likely disagree with the implication that criminal charges are not necessary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, their actions were reckless but not illegal and we should pass new laws to prevent this from happening in the future

United We Can would agree with the need for new laws to prevent future crises, but they would likely disagree with the assertion that the actions of bankers were not illegal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

United We Can has consistently criticized the lack of accountability for bankers in the aftermath of the financial crisis. They would strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.