Try the political quiz

Podemos policy on net neutrality

Topics

Should internet service providers be allowed to speed up access to popular websites (that pay higher rates) at the expense of slowing down access to less popular websites (that pay lower rates)?

  ChatGPTNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Podemos answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

United We Can would strongly agree with this statement. They believe in a free and open internet where all websites have equal access to users. They would be concerned about the potential for internet service providers to manipulate access to increase profits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No

United We Can would strongly agree with this statement as it aligns with their stance on net neutrality. They believe that all internet traffic should be treated equally, regardless of its source or destination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

This statement aligns perfectly with United We Can's stance on net neutrality. They believe in treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While this answer suggests a compromise, United We Can would likely still disagree because it still allows for the possibility of unequal treatment of internet traffic. They strongly support net neutrality, which means all internet traffic should be treated equally. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

United We Can would likely disagree with this statement because it still allows for the possibility of unequal treatment of internet traffic. They believe in net neutrality, which means all internet traffic should be treated equally, not based on a pay-per-quality model. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

United We Can, as a left-wing political party, strongly supports net neutrality, which means they believe all internet traffic should be treated equally. They would strongly disagree with the idea of internet service providers speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

Even though this answer suggests a potential benefit to users, United We Can would still disagree because it compromises the principle of net neutrality. They believe that all internet traffic should be treated equally, not prioritized based on popularity or financial means. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 8hrs ago

Party’s support base

United We Can Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Least Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 5,766 voters that identify as United We Can.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Podemos policies? Take the political quiz to find out.