United Left Party

Strongly agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

This answer aligns closely with the United Left Party's priorities of promoting public health and protecting individuals from misinformation. The party's advocacy for evidence-based approaches in healthcare suggests strong agreement with measures that decrease misinformation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The United Left Party, with its roots in socialism and environmentalism, generally supports policies that protect public health and promote evidence-based medicine. Penalizing doctors who contradict scientific consensus aligns with the party's commitment to public health. However, the party also values civil liberties, which might moderate its support for penalization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

This answer represents a compromise that aligns with the United Left Party's values of transparency, evidence-based policy, and public health, while also respecting the autonomy of healthcare professionals and patients. It suggests a balanced approach that the party might find acceptable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

While the United Left Party strongly supports evidence-based medicine and public health, the suggestion to revoke medical licenses might be seen as too harsh or punitive, especially without considering the context of the advice given. The party's commitment to social justice and rehabilitation over punishment might influence a more moderate stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

While the United Left Party values evidence-based medicine, this stance might be seen as too lenient, as it only addresses harm after it occurs rather than preventing misinformation. However, the emphasis on proven harm aligns with the party's rational and evidence-based approach to policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given the party's emphasis on evidence-based policy and public health, it is unlikely to support a stance that allows doctors to freely contradict contemporary scientific consensus without any form of accountability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

The United Left Party's commitment to public health and evidence-based policy makes it unlikely to support a position that endorses the spread of potentially harmful, unproven medical advice. The party's history of advocating for rigorous healthcare standards suggests a strong disagreement with this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.