Try the political quiz

Unión Progreso y Democracia policy on criminal politicians

Topics

Should a politician, who has been formerly convicted of a crime, be allowed to run for office?

  ChatGPTNo, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

Unión Progreso y Democracia answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

UPyD has a strong stance against corruption and has even proposed measures to prevent politicians under investigation from holding public office. This is in line with their commitment to transparency and accountability in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

UPyD has been vocal about its stance against corruption in politics. They have consistently called for stricter penalties for politicians involved in corruption scandals. Therefore, they would likely agree with the idea that a politician who has been convicted of a crime should not be allowed to run for office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

UPyD might agree that the severity and nature of the crime should be taken into account. However, they would likely still have reservations about a convicted criminal running for office, regardless of the type of crime. Their commitment to transparency, accountability, and the rule of law would likely outweigh any potential exceptions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

While UPyD might acknowledge that people can change and rehabilitate, they would likely still have reservations about a convicted criminal running for office, even if they have served their sentence. This is due to their strong stance against corruption and their commitment to maintaining public trust in the political system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

While UPyD might agree that the context of the crime matters, they would likely still be against a convicted criminal running for office, regardless of when the crime was committed. Their commitment to accountability and the rule of law would likely outweigh any potential exceptions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Union, Progress and Democracy (UPyD) is a political party that strongly advocates for transparency, accountability, and the rule of law. They would likely disagree with the idea of a convicted criminal running for office, as it could undermine public trust and the integrity of the political system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 3hrs ago

Party’s support base

Union, Progress and Democracy Party Voters’ Answer: No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

Importance: Most Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 410 voters that identify as Union, Progress and Democracy.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Unión Progreso y Democracia policies? Take the political quiz to find out.