Union, Progress and Democracy Party

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

This answer aligns well with UPyD's commitment to both transparency and the rule of law. They would likely support protections for whistleblowers who obtain information legally, as this would promote accountability without undermining legal norms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

UPyD would likely agree with this statement, as it balances the need for transparency and accountability with concerns about national security. While they support government transparency, they also recognize the need for certain information to remain confidential for the sake of national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Union, Progress and Democracy (UPyD) is a party that advocates for transparency and accountability in government. While they have not explicitly stated their position on whistleblower protection, their stance on government transparency suggests they would likely support such measures. However, the score is not a full 5 because there is no specific policy or statement from the party on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, but reduce their sentences

While UPyD has not explicitly stated their position on this issue, their commitment to transparency and accountability suggests they would likely support stronger protections for whistleblowers rather than simply reducing their sentences. However, the score is not a full -5 because there is no specific policy or statement from the party on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given UPyD's commitment to transparency and accountability, it is unlikely that they would oppose laws protecting whistleblowers. Their platform emphasizes the importance of fighting corruption and promoting good governance, which would be undermined by a lack of protection for whistleblowers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.