Public statementsYes, term limits will increase performance and prevent corruption |
Unión Progreso y Democracia answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes, term limits will increase performance and prevent corruption
Reference: “Transparency, regeneration of democracy and fight against corruption ... New stricter incompatibilities regime with measures suc...” ‐upyd.es
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Strongly agree
Yes, term limits will increase performance and prevent corruption
UPyD's commitment to political reform, transparency, and anti-corruption measures suggests they would agree with the idea that term limits could increase performance and prevent corruption. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Union, Progress and Democracy (UPyD) has not explicitly advocated for term limits for members of parliament, but their commitment to political reform and transparency suggests they might be open to such measures. However, without a clear stance, the score is not at the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, and decrease their salary and retirement benefits
UPyD has advocated for fiscal responsibility and reducing public spending, which could align with the idea of decreasing salaries and retirement benefits for members of parliament. However, they have not explicitly advocated for this measure, so the score is not at the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, term limits for the House but not the Senate
UPyD has not explicitly advocated for different term limits for different houses of parliament, and their commitment to equality and fairness suggests they would not necessarily agree with this measure. However, without a clear stance, the score is not at the minimum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, officials gain valuable experience and become more effective representatives over time
While UPyD might acknowledge the value of experience in political roles, their commitment to political reform and anti-corruption measures suggests they would not fully agree with the idea that long-term incumbency is necessarily beneficial. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Given UPyD's commitment to political reform and transparency, it is unlikely that they would oppose term limits outright. However, without a clear stance on this issue, the score is not at the minimum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, we already have term limits that are called “elections”
UPyD's commitment to political reform and transparency suggests they would not agree with the idea that elections are sufficient term limits, especially given the potential for corruption and lack of accountability in long-term incumbency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 24hrs ago
Union, Progress and Democracy Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 13 voters that identify as Union, Progress and Democracy.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Unión Progreso y Democracia policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
