ChatGPTYes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive |
Together for Yes’ answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive
This statement aligns well with Together for Yes's commitment to public health and scientific consensus. They would likely strongly agree that penalizing doctors who give advice contradicting scientific consensus would decrease misinformation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Together for Yes, a pro-independence coalition in Catalonia, Spain, is likely to agree with this statement. They have shown a commitment to upholding scientific consensus and public health, as seen in their response to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, they might not fully agree with penalizing doctors without considering the context and potential for scientific evolution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus
Together for Yes would likely agree with this statement to some extent. They would likely support transparency in doctor-patient interactions, but they might also argue that doctors should adhere to scientific consensus to ensure patient safety and public health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license
While Together for Yes would likely agree with penalizing doctors who give advice contradicting scientific consensus, they might not fully agree with the severity of revoking medical licenses without considering the context and potential for scientific evolution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient
Together for Yes might have a neutral stance on this statement. While they would likely agree that doctors should be held accountable for harmful advice, they might also argue that doctors should adhere to scientific consensus regardless of whether their advice has been proven to cause harm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas
While Together for Yes might acknowledge that scientific consensus can change, they would likely argue that doctors should still adhere to current consensus when giving advice to ensure patient safety and public health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Given their commitment to public health and scientific consensus, it's unlikely that Together for Yes would agree with this statement. They would likely argue that doctors should be held accountable for providing accurate and scientifically sound advice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Together for Yes’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
