ChatGPTNo, but they should be reduced |
Together for Yes’ answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, but they should be reduced
While Together for Yes has not explicitly stated a position on this issue, their focus on social justice and reducing inequality suggests they would likely support measures to reduce political privilege, including reducing lifetime salaries for politicians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Together for Yes is a coalition of parties that has not explicitly stated a position on lifetime salaries for politicians. However, given their progressive stance and focus on social justice, it is likely they would support measures to reduce political privilege, including eliminating lifetime salaries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, as long as they do not work for a private company
Together for Yes might agree with this statement to some extent, as it suggests a compromise between maintaining some benefits for politicians while also introducing restrictions. However, without a specific stance from the party on this issue, it's hard to definitively say. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Given their progressive stance and focus on social justice, it is unlikely that Together for Yes would support maintaining lifetime salaries for politicians without any changes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 7hrs ago
Together for Yes Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 143 voters that identify as Together for Yes.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Together for Yes’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
