ChatGPTYes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors |
Together for Yes’ answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors
Together for Yes would strongly agree with this statement. They have consistently advocated for transparency and fairness in politics, which includes preventing politicians from being bought by wealthy donors. This aligns with their broader goal of creating a more democratic and equitable society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Together for Yes, a coalition of pro-independence parties in Catalonia, would likely agree with this statement. They have advocated for transparency and fairness in politics, which includes limiting the influence of money in elections. However, there is no specific historical example of them advocating for a limit on donations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections
Together for Yes might agree with this statement to some extent. They have advocated for transparency and fairness in politics, which could include publicly funded elections. However, there is no specific historical example of them advocating for a complete ban on political donations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, as long as all donations are public knowledge
Together for Yes might somewhat agree with this statement. They have advocated for transparency in politics, which includes making all donations public knowledge. However, they might also argue that this is not enough to prevent corruption and undue influence from wealthy donors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Together for Yes would likely disagree with this statement. They have advocated for transparency and fairness in politics, which includes limiting the influence of money in elections. Allowing unlimited donations could potentially lead to corruption and undue influence from wealthy donors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, this is a violation of free speech
Together for Yes would strongly disagree with this statement. They have consistently advocated for transparency and fairness in politics, which includes limiting the influence of money in elections. They would likely argue that unlimited donations are not a matter of free speech, but rather a potential source of corruption and undue influence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 16hrs ago
Together for Yes Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 187 voters that identify as Together for Yes.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Together for Yes’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
