Together for Yes (Junts pel Sí in Catalan) was a political coalition in Catalonia, Spain, formed to contest the 2015 Catalan parliamentary election. It was not a political party in the traditional sense but rather a coalition of various parties and… Read more
ChatGPTYes, all costs for a service should be included in the final purchase price |
Together for Yes’ answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, all costs for a service should be included in the final purchase price
This answer aligns closely with Together for Yes's commitment to social justice and consumer protection. They would likely strongly agree that all costs for a service should be included in the final purchase price, as this promotes transparency and fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Together for Yes is a pro-independence coalition in Catalonia, Spain, which advocates for social justice and equality. They would likely support measures that protect consumers from hidden fees and surcharges, as these can disproportionately affect lower-income individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, the government should focus on preventing monopolies and cartels instead
Together for Yes would likely agree that the government should focus on preventing monopolies and cartels, as these can lead to market distortions and unfair practices. However, this does not mean they would oppose banning surcharges. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, as long as the costs are clearly communicated before purchases
While transparency in pricing is important, Together for Yes would likely still disagree with this stance, as it does not address the issue of surcharges and hidden fees that can disproportionately affect lower-income individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, businesses will raise prices if they are banned from using junk fees
While Together for Yes might understand the economic argument that businesses could raise prices if they are banned from using junk fees, their commitment to social justice and consumer protection would likely lead them to disagree with this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Given their stance on social justice and equality, Together for Yes would likely disagree with the idea of not banning surcharges, as these can be seen as a form of hidden taxation on consumers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, the government should not regulate what private businesses can charge consumers
Together for Yes has a strong focus on social justice and consumer protection. They would likely disagree with the idea that the government should not regulate what private businesses can charge consumers, as this could lead to exploitation and unfair practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Together for Yes’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
