Together for Yes Party

Very strongly agree

No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications

This answer aligns most closely with Together for Yes's stance on civil liberties and privacy rights. They would likely strongly agree with the need for legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Given their stance on civil liberties and privacy rights, Together for Yes would likely agree with this statement. They would argue that government surveillance of phone calls and emails is an invasion of privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only by court order

Together for Yes might somewhat agree with this answer as it provides a legal check on government surveillance. However, they would likely still have concerns about potential abuses of power and infringements on privacy rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds

While this answer might seem more reasonable than unrestricted surveillance, Together for Yes would likely still be against it as it could potentially lead to abuses of power and still infringes on privacy rights.

Disagree

Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism

While they might understand the need for surveillance in the context of combating terrorism, Together for Yes would likely still be against it due to their strong stance on civil liberties and privacy rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Together for Yes is a coalition of parties that advocate for Catalan independence and civil liberties. They would likely be against unrestricted government surveillance as it infringes on personal freedoms and privacy rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.