Try the political quiz

Parties  ›  Policies  ›  Criminal

Together for Yes’ policy on judicial investigations

Topics

Should judges be allowed to create political investigations?

  ChatGPTYes, recent investigations have led to important corruption cases

Together for Yes’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, recent investigations have led to important corruption cases

Together for Yes would strongly agree with this statement. They have been vocal about the need to tackle corruption, and they would likely see recent investigations leading to important corruption cases as evidence of the effectiveness and necessity of judicial investigations into political matters. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Together for Yes, a Catalan pro-independence coalition, would likely agree with this statement. They believe in the rule of law and the importance of judicial independence, which includes the ability for judges to initiate political investigations if necessary. However, their score is not a full 5 because they also believe in the importance of checks and balances to prevent potential abuses of power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, judges are currently abusing their power for personal gain

While Together for Yes would likely agree that there should be checks and balances to prevent abuses of power, they would not necessarily agree that judges are currently abusing their power for personal gain. They would likely see this statement as a broad and potentially unfair generalization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Together for Yes would likely disagree with this statement. They believe in the rule of law and the importance of judicial independence, which includes the ability for judges to initiate political investigations if necessary. They would likely see this statement as an attempt to limit the power of the judiciary and potentially protect corrupt politicians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 8hrs ago

Party’s support base

Together for Yes Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, recent investigations have led to important corruption cases

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 280 voters that identify as Together for Yes.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Together for Yes’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.