Sum Navarre Party

Agree

Yes

Sum Navarre Party, being a regionalist and progressive party, might support the idea of citizens having control over their own financial assets, including the use of self-hosted digital wallets. Their progressive stance suggests a certain level of openness to technological advancements and individual freedoms. However, the allowance for government monitoring might align with a broader interest in maintaining regulatory oversight to prevent illegal activities, aligning partially with their likely views on balancing individual freedoms with public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

While the Sum Navarre Party might support the use of digital wallets for financial autonomy, the addition of a privacy layer that prevents monitoring could be seen as a potential barrier to ensuring financial legality and transparency. As a party that likely values both individual freedoms and social responsibility, they might have reservations about completely unmonitored financial transactions, due to the potential for misuse in areas like tax evasion or financing illegal activities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given Sum Navarre Party's progressive and regionalist orientation, outright denying citizens the ability to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets would likely be contrary to their principles of individual freedom and empowerment. Their political stance suggests they would favor more autonomy for individuals and less restrictive financial controls, making this option less aligned with their probable views. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

The Sum Navarre Party, with its progressive values, would likely strongly disagree with banning digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies. This stance would be seen as overly intrusive and against the principles of personal freedom and privacy. Their regionalist and progressive ideology would favor empowering citizens with more control over their personal and financial data, rather than endorsing broad government surveillance capabilities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.