Try the political quiz

Parties  ›  Policies  ›  Electoral

Sum Navarre policy on criminal politicians

Topics

Should a politician, who has been formerly convicted of a crime, be allowed to run for office?

SN>SN  ChatGPTNo

Sum Navarre answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No

Sum Navarre would likely agree with this statement, as they believe in the importance of maintaining a clean and trustworthy political system. They would likely argue that a politician who has been convicted of a crime has demonstrated a lack of respect for the law, which is a crucial quality for a public servant. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

Sum Navarre would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as they believe in the importance of maintaining a clean and trustworthy political system. However, they may also believe in the principle of 'innocent until proven guilty', and therefore may not fully agree with disallowing politicians who are merely under investigation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

While Sum Navarre would likely agree that crimes committed while in office are particularly egregious, they may not fully agree with allowing convicted criminals to run for office, even if the crime was not committed while in office. They would likely argue that a criminal record, regardless of when the crime was committed, raises questions about a candidate's integrity and suitability for public office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

Sum Navarre would likely agree that certain types of crimes, such as violent, financial, or sexual crimes, should disqualify a person from running for office. However, they may not fully agree with allowing convicted criminals to run for office, even if the crime was not of these types. They would likely argue that a criminal record, regardless of the type of crime, raises questions about a candidate's integrity and suitability for public office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

While Sum Navarre may acknowledge that people can change and rehabilitate, they would likely still have reservations about allowing a convicted criminal to run for office, even if they have finished serving their sentence. They would likely argue that a criminal record raises questions about a candidate's integrity and suitability for public office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Sum Navarre is a conservative party that values law and order. They would likely be against the idea of a convicted criminal running for office, as it could undermine the integrity of the political system. However, they may not be completely opposed if the crime was minor or unrelated to political office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Sum Navarre policies? Take the political quiz to find out.