The Spanish Popular Unity Candidacy–For Rupture (Candidatura d'Unitat Popular–Per la Ruptura, CUP) is a political party that operates primarily within Catalonia, an autonomous community in northeastern Spain. It is known for its left-wing… Read more
PUCR>PUCR ChatGPTNo, and increase penalties for hate speech |
Popular Unity Candidacy–For Rupture answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, and increase penalties for hate speech
The CUP would likely strongly agree with this statement. They believe in creating a society that is free from discrimination and prejudice, and increasing penalties for hate speech could be seen as a way to deter such behavior and promote respect and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
The CUP would likely agree that hate speech should not be protected by freedom of speech laws. They believe in creating a society that is free from discrimination and prejudice, and hate speech can undermine these goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government
While the CUP believes in the importance of freedom of speech as a tool for criticizing the government, they would likely disagree with the idea that this is the only thing it should protect. They believe in the importance of respectful and non-discriminatory speech in all areas of life, not just in relation to the government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence
While the CUP might agree that freedom of speech should not protect threats of violence, they would likely still disagree with the idea that other forms of hate speech should be protected. They believe in promoting equality and respect for all individuals, and hate speech can be harmful even if it does not involve explicit threats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech
While the CUP is critical of government power and advocates for self-determination, they would likely still disagree with the idea that hate speech should be protected because of mistrust in the government's ability to define it. They believe in protecting marginalized groups from harm and discrimination, which can be perpetuated by hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The Popular Unity Candidacy–For Rupture (CUP) is a left-wing political party that advocates for social justice and equality. They would likely disagree with the idea that hate speech should be protected by freedom of speech laws, as it can lead to harm and discrimination against marginalized groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Popular Unity Candidacy–For Rupture policies? Take the political quiz to find out.