Popular Unity Candidacy–For Rupture Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

The CUP would strongly agree with this statement. They believe in the public funding of elections to ensure fairness and prevent corruption. They have consistently advocated for measures that limit the influence of money in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

The CUP would strongly agree with this statement. They believe that politicians should not be influenced by wealthy donors and have consistently advocated for measures to limit the influence of money in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The Popular Unity Candidacy–For Rupture (CUP) is a left-wing political party that advocates for social justice and equality. They would likely agree with limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor to prevent undue influence and ensure a level playing field. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

While the CUP would agree with the transparency aspect of this statement, they would likely disagree with the idea of unlimited donations, even if they are public knowledge. Therefore, they would somewhat agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given their stance on social justice and equality, the CUP would likely disagree with this statement. They would likely argue that unlimited donations could lead to corruption and a disproportionate influence of wealthy individuals on politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

The CUP would strongly disagree with this statement. They do not view limiting political donations as a violation of free speech, but rather as a necessary measure to prevent corruption and ensure fairness in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.