Popular Unity Candidacy Party

Strongly agree

Yes, recent investigations have led to important corruption cases

The CUP would likely strongly agree with this statement. They have been vocal about the need to address corruption within the political system, and would likely see judicial investigations as a key tool in this effort. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Popular Unity Candidacy (CUP) would likely agree with this statement, as they believe in the importance of checks and balances within the political system. However, they might not strongly agree due to potential concerns about judicial overreach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, judges are currently abusing their power for personal gain

While the CUP might agree that there are instances of judges abusing their power, they would likely not see this as a reason to completely disallow judges from creating political investigations. They would likely argue for more oversight and accountability rather than a complete ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The CUP would likely disagree with this statement, as they believe in the importance of checks and balances within the political system. They would likely see the ability of judges to create political investigations as a necessary part of this system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.