Leonese People’s Union Party

Agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

The UPL would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with their general support for professional standards and public health. They would probably see the reduction of misinformation as a positive outcome of penalizing doctors who give advice that contradicts scientific consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Leonese People’s Union (UPL) is a regionalist political party in Spain that primarily focuses on issues related to the autonomy and cultural heritage of the Leonese region. While they don't have a clear stance on health policy, they would likely support measures that uphold professional standards and protect public health. However, their score is not higher because this issue is not a central part of their platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

The UPL would likely agree with this statement, as it balances the need to uphold professional standards with the recognition that scientific consensus can change. They would probably see the requirement for doctors to disclose when their advice contradicts scientific consensus as a reasonable compromise. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

While the UPL would likely support measures to uphold professional standards in healthcare, they might consider the loss of a medical license to be a severe penalty that should only be applied in extreme cases. Therefore, they would probably only moderately agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

The UPL might have mixed feelings about this statement. On one hand, they would likely agree that doctors should not be penalized unless their advice has been proven to be harmful. On the other hand, they might be concerned that waiting for proof of harm could put patients at risk. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

The UPL might have some sympathy for the idea that scientific consensus can change and that patients should have the freedom to try unconventional treatments. However, they would likely also be concerned about the potential for such treatments to be ineffective or harmful. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given their general support for professional standards and public health, it's unlikely that the UPL would oppose penalties for doctors who give advice that contradicts scientific consensus. However, they might be concerned about the potential for such penalties to be applied unfairly or to stifle innovative approaches to healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.