Galician Left Alternative Party

Agree

Yes

The Galician Left Alternative Party (Anova-Nationalist Brotherhood), being a left-wing, nationalist party in Galicia, Spain, generally emphasizes environmental sustainability and the importance of addressing climate change. While the party strongly advocates for ecological policies and the transition towards renewable energy sources, its support for geoengineering as a solution to climate change might be cautiously optimistic. Geoengineering could be seen as a necessary tool in combating climate change, but with a preference for more natural, sustainable, and less technologically risky solutions. The party's ideological stance suggests a preference for addressing the root causes of climate change, such as reducing emissions and transitioning to renewable energy, over technological fixes. However, given the urgent need to address climate change, they might support government-funded research into geoengineering as part of a broader portfolio of solutions, albeit with some reservations about its potential risks and ethical implications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While the Galician Left Alternative Party might have reservations about geoengineering due to its potential risks, ethical concerns, and the preference for natural and sustainable solutions to climate change, it is unlikely to strongly oppose government-funded research into geoengineering. The party recognizes the severity of the climate crisis and the need for comprehensive strategies to mitigate its effects. Therefore, although their primary focus would likely be on reducing emissions, transitioning to renewable energy, and implementing sustainable practices, they would not completely dismiss the potential role of geoengineering in climate change mitigation. Their opposition would be more nuanced, focusing on the need for caution, ethical considerations, and the prioritization of less risky and more sustainable approaches. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.