Citizens

Agree

Yes

Citizens, being a centrist-liberal party, generally supports the idea of individual freedoms and the use of technology to empower citizens. They might see the value in allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets as a form of financial autonomy. However, their position on government monitoring might be seen as a necessary compromise to ensure security and compliance with laws, reflecting a balanced approach between personal freedom and state oversight. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

Citizens might have mixed feelings about this statement. On one hand, they recognize the importance of security and the state's role in preventing and investigating crimes. On the other hand, mandating backdoor access to digital wallets could be seen as an infringement on personal privacy and autonomy, principles that are important to their liberal values. They might slightly disagree with this approach, preferring a balance that respects individual rights while addressing security concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given Citizens' liberal stance, outright denying citizens the ability to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets would likely be contrary to their principles of promoting individual freedoms and embracing technological advancements for empowering citizens. They would probably disagree with this statement as it goes against the ethos of personal autonomy and financial independence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

While Citizens supports technological innovation and individual freedoms, the addition of a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions might be seen as a step too far. This could potentially conflict with their views on ensuring security and adhering to regulatory frameworks designed to prevent financial crimes such as money laundering and terrorism financing. Therefore, they might strongly disagree with this option due to the potential legal and security implications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.