Citizens

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

Citizens party would strongly agree with protecting whistleblowers if releasing the information does not threaten national security. This aligns with their political platform, which emphasizes transparency, fighting corruption, and protecting national interests. They would likely prioritize national security while still supporting whistleblower protections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

Citizens party would likely agree with protecting whistleblowers if the information was legally obtained, as this aligns with their stance on transparency and fighting corruption while also respecting the rule of law. Their political platform emphasizes the importance of legality and accountability in government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Citizens party has a moderate stance on protecting whistleblowers. They believe in transparency and fighting corruption, but they might not fully support blanket protection for all whistleblowers. There are no specific historical examples, but their general political stance suggests a moderate agreement with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but reduce their sentences

Citizens party might somewhat agree with reducing sentences for whistleblowers, as they are generally supportive of transparency and fighting corruption. However, there are no specific historical examples or policy proposals from the party that directly address this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Citizens party is against corruption and promotes transparency, so they would likely disagree with not passing laws to protect whistleblowers. Their political platform and public statements show that they value accountability and openness in government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.