Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals

Very strongly agree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

PACMA would likely strongly agree with this statement, as they would likely support any measures that could help to prevent harm or mistreatment of animals or their advocates. They might believe that increasing penalties for hate speech could help to deter such speech and thus reduce the potential harm it could cause. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

PACMA would likely agree with this statement, as they are likely to believe that hate speech can lead to harm or mistreatment of animals or individuals advocating for their rights. They would likely support laws that protect against hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

While PACMA might agree that freedom of speech should not protect speech that threatens violence, they might still disagree with the idea that other forms of hate speech should be protected. This is because they might believe that any form of hate speech can contribute to a culture of harm or mistreatment towards animals or their advocates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

While PACMA might have concerns about government overreach, they would likely still disagree with the idea that hate speech should be protected due to the potential harm it could cause to animals or their advocates. They might believe that the potential harm outweighs the potential risk of government overreach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals (PACMA) is a political party that advocates for animal rights and welfare. They would likely disagree with the idea that hate speech should be protected by freedom of speech laws, as this could potentially lead to harm or mistreatment of animals or individuals advocating for their rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

PACMA would likely disagree with this statement, as they would likely believe that freedom of speech laws should protect more than just criticism of the government. They might believe that these laws should also protect advocacy for animal rights and welfare, and should not protect hate speech that could harm animals or their advocates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.