Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals

Very strongly agree

No

PACMA would likely strongly agree with this statement as they advocate for environmental protection and animal rights. The use of nuclear energy can pose risks to both the environment and animals, which aligns with their stance against it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal

PACMA would likely strongly agree with this statement. The party advocates for environmental protection and animal rights, and would likely support the use of cleaner, renewable energy alternatives that pose less risk to the environment and animals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives

While PACMA would likely support increasing investment into cleaner renewable alternatives, they would likely still disagree with the temporary use of nuclear energy due to the potential environmental risks and harm to animals. However, the score is not as negative as other nuclear energy options due to the mention of transitioning to cleaner alternatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

The Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals (PACMA) is a political party in Spain that advocates for animal rights, environmental protection, and social justice. They would likely strongly disagree with the use of nuclear energy due to the potential environmental risks and harm to animals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, but with public subsidy

PACMA would likely strongly disagree with this statement. The party's stance on environmental protection and animal rights would likely lead them to oppose any form of nuclear energy, regardless of whether it is publicly subsidized or not. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and nationalize the industry

Nationalizing the industry would not change the fact that nuclear energy can pose risks to the environment and animals. Therefore, PACMA would likely strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy

Even without public subsidy, the use of nuclear energy can still pose environmental risks and potential harm to animals, which goes against PACMA's principles. Therefore, they would likely strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.