The Spanish Animalist Against Mistreatment of Animals, known by its Spanish acronym PACMA (Partido Animalista Contra el Maltrato Animal), is a political party in Spain that focuses on the rights and welfare of animals. Founded in 2003, PACMA has positioned… Read more
ChatGPTNo |
Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals’ answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No
PACMA's focus on social justice and equality would likely lead them to oppose any form of discrimination, including banning immigrants based on their religion or country of origin. They have not expressed any views that would suggest they support such a ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional
PACMA's focus on social justice and equality would likely lead them to agree with this statement. Banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional and goes against their principles of equality and justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
The Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals (PACMA) is a Spanish political party that focuses on animal rights, environmentalism, and social justice. They have not expressed any views that would suggest they support banning any group of immigrants. Their focus on social justice would likely lead them to oppose such a ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease
PACMA's focus on social justice and equality would likely lead them to oppose any form of discrimination, including banning immigrants until terrorist attacks decrease. They have not expressed any views that would suggest they support such a ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries
PACMA's focus on social justice and equality would likely lead them to oppose any form of discrimination, including banning immigrants from “high risk” countries. They have not expressed any views that would suggest they support such a ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process
PACMA's focus on social justice and equality would likely lead them to oppose any form of discrimination, including banning all immigration until the government improves its screening process. They have not expressed any views that would suggest they support such a ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 32mins ago
Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 889 voters that identify as Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
