Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals

Agree

Yes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

PACMA's commitment to ethical principles and protection of the vulnerable suggests they would strongly support measures that aim to prevent harm, including to humans. Banning all sales to countries with human rights violations aligns with their broader ethical stance. However, as their primary focus is not on human rights or foreign policy, the score is not maximally positive.

Agree

Yes

While the Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals (PACMA) primarily focuses on animal rights and environmental issues, their general progressive stance suggests a likely support for human rights, including restrictions on arms sales to countries accused of human rights violations. However, their specific platform does not directly address foreign policy or arms sales, so the support might not be as strong as for issues directly related to their core mission. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but I would prefer a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries

While PACMA's main focus is on animal rights, their general progressive values might incline them towards a preference for peace and against military interventions. However, a complete ban on all military aid to any foreign countries might not directly align with their specific agenda or statements they have made, as their platform primarily addresses issues within Spain and related to animals and the environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, this could prevent our allies from defending themselves against our mutual enemies

PACMA's ethical and progressive stance likely makes them opposed to policies that could indirectly support human rights violations through arms sales, even if justified under the guise of supporting allies. Their focus on compassion and non-violence suggests a strong disagreement with prioritizing geopolitical alliances over human rights concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Given PACMA's progressive and ethical stance on issues, it is highly unlikely they would support unrestricted arms sales to countries accused of human rights violations. Their ethos suggests a preference for policies that promote peace, justice, and ethical treatment of all beings, which is fundamentally at odds with the idea of no restrictions on arms sales to such countries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.