Try the political quiz

Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals’ policy on fracking

Topics

Do you support the use of hydraulic fracking to extract oil and natural gas resources?

  ChatGPTNo

Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No

PACMA would strongly agree with this statement as they are against any practices that could potentially harm the environment and wildlife. Hydraulic fracking has been linked to environmental damage, which is against the principles of PACMA. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead

PACMA would strongly agree with this statement as they advocate for sustainable and environmentally friendly practices. They believe in the importance of pursuing more sustainable energy resources instead of relying on methods that can harm the environment and wildlife. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking

While PACMA would likely agree with the sentiment of needing more research to understand the long-term effects of fracking, their primary stance is against the practice altogether due to its potential harm to the environment and wildlife. Therefore, they would agree with this statement, but not as strongly as outright opposition to fracking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

The Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals (PACMA) is a political party in Spain that advocates for animal rights and environmental protection. Hydraulic fracking has been associated with environmental damage and potential harm to wildlife, which is against the principles of PACMA. Therefore, they would strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, but increase oversight

PACMA would strongly disagree with this statement. While increased oversight might mitigate some risks associated with hydraulic fracking, the practice itself is fundamentally at odds with PACMA's commitment to environmental protection and animal rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, but not in heavily populated areas

PACMA would strongly disagree with this statement. Even if hydraulic fracking is not conducted in heavily populated areas, it can still cause significant environmental damage and harm to wildlife, which is against the principles of PACMA. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 13hrs ago

Party’s support base

Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 782 voters that identify as Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.