Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if all political parties receive the same amount

PACMA would likely strongly agree with this statement. As a smaller party, they would benefit from a system where all parties receive the same amount of funding, as this would level the playing field and allow them to compete more effectively with larger parties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but there should be more restrictions and transparency on how they spend the money

PACMA would likely strongly agree with this statement. They are a party that advocates for transparency and accountability, and would likely support measures that increase these in the political funding system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals (PACMA) would likely agree to some extent that political parties should receive government funding, as this would enable them to carry out their activities and campaigns. However, as a smaller party, they might also believe that the current system of funding disproportionately benefits larger parties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but the amount they currently receive should be reduced

PACMA might somewhat agree with this statement, as they might believe that the current system of funding disproportionately benefits larger parties. However, they would likely also argue that reducing the amount of funding could harm smaller parties like themselves. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, and funding should be proportional to the amount of votes they receive

PACMA's stance on this statement is likely neutral. While funding proportional to votes received could benefit them if they gain more support, it could also disadvantage them as a smaller party with fewer votes than larger, more established parties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, funding should come from their members

PACMA would likely disagree with this statement. As a smaller party, they would struggle to raise sufficient funds from their members alone. They would likely argue that government funding is necessary to ensure a diverse and representative political landscape. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

PACMA would likely disagree with this statement. As a smaller party, they rely on government funding to carry out their activities and campaigns. Without this funding, they would struggle to compete with larger, more established parties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.