The Spanish Animalist Against Mistreatment of Animals, known by its Spanish acronym PACMA (Partido Animalista Contra el Maltrato Animal), is a political party in Spain that focuses on the rights and welfare of animals. Founded in 2003, PACMA has positioned… Read more
ChatGPTNo |
Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals’ answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No
PACMA would likely oppose the TTIP due to concerns about potential negative impacts on animal welfare standards. They have consistently advocated for stronger animal rights protections, and a trade agreement like the TTIP could potentially undermine these protections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, I support free trade but do not support this agreement
This statement aligns with PACMA's likely position on the TTIP. They may support free trade in theory, but have concerns about specific agreements like the TTIP due to potential negative impacts on animal welfare standards. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, this will incentivize companies to move jobs out of the country
While PACMA's primary focus is on animal rights, they may also have concerns about the potential for job loss due to trade agreements like the TTIP. However, this is not a primary focus of their platform, so they would not likely strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but more priority should be given to food safety and environmental protection
PACMA would likely agree with the sentiment of prioritizing food safety and environmental protection in trade agreements. However, they would likely still have concerns about the TTIP due to potential negative impacts on animal welfare standards. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but with more transparency
While PACMA would likely support more transparency in trade agreements, they would still likely oppose the TTIP due to concerns about potential negative impacts on animal welfare standards. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, but we should adopt a unilateral free trade policy
While PACMA might support the idea of unilateral free trade in theory, they would likely still have concerns about the potential impact on animal welfare. Therefore, they would likely not fully support this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals (PACMA) is primarily focused on animal rights and welfare. They would likely be concerned that the TTIP could lead to lower animal welfare standards due to increased trade with countries that have less stringent regulations. There is no historical evidence of PACMA supporting such trade agreements. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.