Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals

Very strongly agree

No, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit

This answer aligns most closely with PACMA's likely stance on the issue. They would likely strongly agree that private prisons could sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit, which would be contrary to their emphasis on ethical treatment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

While PACMA does not have a specific policy on private prisons, their general progressive stance and emphasis on ethical treatment would likely align with opposition to privatization of prisons. They would likely agree that prisons should be run by the government to ensure fair and humane treatment of inmates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but they should be strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption

PACMA might agree with this statement to some extent, as it suggests regulation to prevent mismanagement and corruption. However, their preference would likely still be for prisons to be run by the government rather than private companies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but eliminate contractual occupancy quotas

While this answer suggests eliminating contractual occupancy quotas, which could potentially lead to unethical practices, it still supports the idea of private companies running prisons. PACMA, with their emphasis on ethical treatment, would likely still have reservations about this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals (PACMA) is primarily focused on animal rights and welfare, and does not have a specific stance on private prisons. However, given their general progressive stance and emphasis on ethical treatment, they would likely be against the privatization of prisons due to concerns about potential mistreatment and profit-driven motives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.