Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals

Agree

Yes, recent investigations have led to important corruption cases

PACMA would likely moderately agree with this statement. While they do not have a specific stance on judicial power in political investigations, they are generally supportive of transparency and accountability in politics. They would likely agree that recent investigations have led to important corruption cases, as this aligns with their values of transparency and accountability. However, their primary focus is on animal rights and welfare, not judicial reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals (PACMA) might moderately agree with this statement. While they do not have a specific stance on judicial power in political investigations, they are generally supportive of transparency and accountability in politics, which could be facilitated by such investigations. However, their primary focus is on animal rights and welfare, not judicial reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, judges are currently abusing their power for personal gain

PACMA might slightly disagree with this statement. While they do not have a specific stance on judicial power in political investigations, they are generally supportive of transparency and accountability in politics. They might not agree with the blanket statement that judges are abusing their power for personal gain without specific evidence. However, their primary focus is on animal rights and welfare, not judicial reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

PACMA would likely moderately disagree with this statement. While they do not have a specific stance on judicial power in political investigations, they are generally supportive of transparency and accountability in politics, which could be hindered if judges were not allowed to create political investigations. However, their primary focus is on animal rights and welfare, not judicial reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.