@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@934FYBV2yrs2Y
yes if they were negligent and sold a deadly weapon to someone who did not meet certain requirements and is not fit to own a firearm
@92ZT2NT2yrs2Y
Yes, but it depends on whether the firearms dealer is actually legit.
@92YWM6Y2yrs2Y
No, a manufacturer only makes the firearm, it's the individual that choose to commit the crime.
@929L7YP2yrs2Y
Manufacturers should not be held liable, however firearm dealers should be held liable.
@929HMS22yrs2Y
No sue the person who used the gun.
@929DQCT2yrs2Y
No because it is not they're responsible to take care of the guns. It's the victims who purchase those guns should be the blame for.
@924Z52F2yrs2Y
Yes, only if the buyer wasn´t properly evaluated and approved for the firearm.
@924BCVX2yrs2Y
No this is absolutely stupid. It is not their fault for what the people they sell items to decide to do with them.
@8ZM5SSL2yrs2Y
Yes, if the business did not take the proper persuasions to ensure the likeliness of the gun being used for legal activities
@8ZM5DYK2yrs2Y
No, because it's the person who created the gun violence's choice to do that.
@8ZGPM3H2yrs2Y
no, because you cant blame the person who sold the gun or made it for you getting shot they didn't pull the trigger.
@8ZGPKQB2yrs2Y
It's half and half. If it's the shop's fault, they can be sued, but if it wasn't, they shouldn't be sued.
@8Z9R7P22yrs2Y
No, manufacturers are not responsible for gun violence, only the business.
@8ZBSCCY2yrs2Y
No, why would the dealer be aware of what the buyer is using the gun for?
@RickStewart2yrs2Y
If a dealer or manufacturer is negligent, anyone should be able to sue them.
@8Z2VTYT2yrs2Y
Yes But Only Dealers if there were no restrictions to buying the gun like background checks.
@8YZTXJB2yrs2Y
Yes, but only if they didn’t run proper background checks and psychological tests on the person they sold it to. Turning a blind eye for the sake of profit should be punished.
@8YX6WD32yrs2Y
no, the dealer should not be liable for the buyers actions.
@8YX4JT92yrs2Y
The gun is only as dangerous as its user, not its producer.
@8YVSVLS2yrs2Y
It depends on how it was used and if the damage was a lot.
@8YTGBRG2yrs2Y
Yes, if they didn't give proper checks on mental health and background
@8YQ34652yrs2Y
No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence on their part
@8YDDQXR2yrs2Y
if the gun that harmed them is from that dealership or manufacture.
@8YDJR362yrs2Y
Yes, if it was known to be used in that way or didnt follow the laws when selling
@8YCMCFZ2yrs2Y
Yes, but only if the dealer was found to have sold the gun illegally or without the proper background checks and precautions
@73MMJHK2yrs2Y
No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence unless the buyer was known to be unfit for the weapon before selling
@8Y7MTL72yrs2Y
Only if the seller of the firearm carelessly sold it to them without thinking about the person’s background or mental health than yes, he or she should be held responsible.
@8Y7J4P32yrs2Y
The person who harmed the victim should be held liable not those who made the gun unless there the same person.
@8Y4RVFN2yrs2Y
No, unless said dealer does not do a background check or knows of what criminal/illegal activity will happen after the purchase.
@8XTSRKH2yrs2Y
I think the dealer that sold the person who attacked the gun violence victim should be sued.
@8XT5R4B2yrs2Y
NO. We shouldn't be allowed to sue the gun maker because some fool used it in a crime. If this same fool ran me over with a Cadillac, should I be able to sue GM for making the car? Really?
@8XSMPHJ2yrs2Y
@8XPB39B2yrs2Y
Yes but only if there was not enough background checks done on the person
@8XP4KW42yrs2Y
It is a right to have a firearm
@8XH4JN82yrs2Y
No because it's not the dealers or manufacturers who are committing the crimes. Guns don't shoot people. People shoot people.
@8XGX4B42yrs2Y
Yes, if the victim can prove that the company/organization was responsible for influencing the malicious use of a gun
@8XFTG972yrs2Y
Yes, but only for the dealers who sold the weapon to criminals.
@DengekiMatsuko3yrs3Y
Yes, if the firearms dealer didn't go through the standard process of selling the firearm.
@8X9NK663yrs3Y
I think if they don't do an extensive background check than yes they should also be sued