Union, Progress and Democracy Political Party

Enig

Ja

Union, Progress and Democracy Party (UPyD) has a history of advocating for policies that aim to improve public health and welfare, suggesting a potential openness to regulating products that negatively affect young people's health. However, their core focus on issues like national unity, education reform, and civil liberties means they might not prioritize such bans as highly as other interventions. There's no specific historical reference to UPyD pushing for a ban on the promotion of unhealthy products, but their general stance on public health could lean towards supporting measures that protect young people. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej

While UPyD emphasizes individual freedoms and might be wary of overly paternalistic government policies, their commitment to public health and the well-being of citizens suggests they would not strongly oppose measures aimed at protecting young people from unhealthy lifestyle promotions. Their lack of a strong libertarian streak means they are unlikely to strongly disagree with such bans, especially if presented as a way to safeguard public health and reduce healthcare costs in the long term. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.