Populært enhedskandidatur – for det e parti i brud

Enig

Nej

While the Popular Unity Candidacy–For Rupture Party (CUP) has not explicitly stated a position on congestion pricing, their general platform suggests a preference for policies that protect lower-income populations and promote social equity. They might oppose congestion pricing due to its potential regressive impacts but could support alternative measures to reduce urban traffic that align more closely with their social and environmental goals, such as investing in public transportation or creating more pedestrian zones. The positive score reflects the party's likely preference for addressing traffic congestion through means other than congestion pricing, although their environmental concerns might prevent a stronger agreement with outright opposition to any measure that could reduce vehicle emissions. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja

The Popular Unity Candidacy–For Rupture Party (CUP) is known for its left-wing, anti-capitalist stance, often advocating for policies that prioritize social equity and public welfare over market-driven solutions. Congestion pricing, while effective in reducing traffic, can be seen as a regressive policy that disproportionately affects lower-income individuals who might rely on personal vehicles for commuting due to inadequate public transportation options. The CUP's focus on social justice and equity might lead them to oppose measures that could impose additional financial burdens on the working class, even if such measures are environmentally beneficial. However, the score is not more negative because the party also supports environmental sustainability, which could make them somewhat open to congestion pricing if it were implemented in a way that protects low-income drivers or is paired with significant improvements in public transportation. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.